Film Scanner 5 7

Printfile 357B100 35MM Negatives 7 Strips 5 Frames Sheets 100-pack
Printfile 357B100 Printfile 35MM Negatives 7 Strips 5 Frames Sheets 100-pack.

Price: $16.39 | Learn more

Should I buy this?????
Its called a Slide & Film Digital Scanner its from Sears. Does anyone have one? If not, it converts old 35 mm slides and film negatives into digital images, does it sound like it will work? This is what the details on the card thing are: 1) 35mm film scanner 2) 5.0 megapixels CMOS sensor equals 1829 dpi enhanced 3600 dpi 3)10 bits per colour channel for data conversion 4)fixed focus 5)Automatic eposure control 6)Automatic colour balance 7) 3 white LED back light source

if you have old pictures you'd like to save it's a good idea a way to preserve history even if it's just family pictures it may sound a little corny but someone is always interested in the past
bud the hippie  |  Read more

---

Anyone here knows who become an atheist in hollywood (and non-hollywood)?
Well,basically,what i meant is people who works in cinema industry,who already attracted international attention and being a world "superstar",that weren't affiliated with any kind of organized religion. For example,as far as i know,below these are few famous names who had widely known as "an (openly) atheist" in movie business : 1.Luis Bunuel (Spain born-Mexican director,screenwriter) quote : "Thank GOD,i'm still an atheist" most notable film : Belle De Jour (1967) 2.Stanley Kubrick (American director,Film Producer,Screenwriter) most notable film : A Clockwork Orange(1972) 3.Ingmar Bergman (Swedish director,producer,screenwriter) most notable film : Seventh Seal(In sweden :Det sjunde inseglet)(1957) 4.Roman Polanski (Polish director,producer,screenwriter) most notable film : Rosemary's baby(1968) 5.Woody Allen (American director,screenwriter,musician) most notable film : Annie Hall(1977) 6.David Cronenberg (Canadian director) most notable film : Scanners(1981) 7.Robert Altman (American director) most notable film : M*A*S*H(1970) 8.George Clooney (American actor,director,screenwriter) most notable film : Good Night and Good Luck(2005) and most notable role : Ocean's Eleven (2000) 9.Robert Redford (American actor,director,screenwriter) most notable film : Ordinary People(1985) and most notable role : Butch Cassidy and Sundance kid (1969) 10..?? So,That's all i know.Anyone else? I heard,There are many young great directors who also being an atheist.Guillermo Del Toro? or Darren Aronofsky? maybe Steven Soderbergh?Well,you should tell me cause,i was just guessing based on their magnificent works and tv interview.I honestly have no idea.Haha.. Thank you,by the way.I really need that for my personal data. FYI : I'm a movie nerd from asia and always interested to find out what was keep going around inside all brilliant filmmaker's heads until they were able to create ...such as "unbeatable masterpiece".

Cillian Murphy is an atheist: http://www.hollywood.com/news/Murphy_Turns_Atheist_After_Work_on_Sci_Fi_Thriller/3673810 Okay, there's a book called "Celebrities In Hell: A Guide to Hollywood's Atheists, Agnostics, Skeptics, Free Thinkers, and More" and it lists a whole bunch of athiests. I also found a Wikipedia entry, but keep in mind that anyone can edit Wikipedia so it might not be the most accurate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_atheists_(film,_radio,_television_and_theatre) There are a lot of surprising atheists on that page too. Hope I helped!
Frosty  |  Read more

---

Can you name 50 random things in your bedroom?
so... i was looking for one my ps2 game, and failing. I started looking at the things lying around my room, and i thought... man i am weird, or something... So, can you guys name 50 things that are sitting on your desk, on your bed, floor in the closet, whatever... but inside your bedroom. 01 4 psp games 02 night vision goggles 03 cavin and hobbes comic book 04 portable ham radio 05 laser level 06 empty toolbox 07 trigonometry homework 08 screwdriver 09 bluetooth headset 10 dirty spoon 11 pile of broken glass 12 lcd cleaner spray 13 dsl phone line filter 14 uhf coaxial cable connecters 15 canadian quarter 16 nail clippers 17 glue 18 pen 19 fork 20 bucklies cough medicine 21 brush from haircutting kit 22 majicjack usb adaptor 23 rosin core solder 24 ultraviolet led flashlight 25 broken chair 26 another spoon 27 peltier junction 28 dlink router 29 another broken chair 30 usb monitor color calibration device 31 5/8 inch sparkplug socket 32 about 50 different alan keys 33 2x dvi to hdmi converters 34 nmhi battery 35 final fantasy 7 ps1 game 36 mini torch 37 dvi to vga converter 38 110 volt spare wall outlet 39 remote part of ethernet cable tester 40 some razor blades 41 scsi pci card 42 49 key piano 43 about 20 blank dvds 44 drywall fixing tools and drywall compound 45 portable analogue tv 46 shortwave radio 47 blue glass bottle 48 expired amoxicillin tryhydrate 49 psp pandora tool battery 50 nikon scsi film scanner if you dont want to take time for 50, then just post 10 or 20, just random stuff lying around... Wow... It is quite interesting what you can tell about a person's character, likes and dislikes just from the stuff in their bedroom.. I did not expect this to be so interesting, but it is quite impressive to read over.

Your question: "Can you name 50 random things in your bedroom?" My answer : "Yes I can" Cheese to you.
ß¡ģ ζĦәәŠë  |  Read more

---

Would anyone want to critique these photos?
I've answered hundreds of questions on Yahoo Answers. But I have never posted any of my pictures for a serious critique. But I thought I would just post some of them now and see what people think - just out of curiosity. These were all taken with film, using completely manual exposure, and I developed the black and white film and pictures myself. These are scans from my original prints. (My scanner sucks though). These are all large images (high resolution scans) so you might have to zoom out, depending on what kind of browser you're using. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/BigBearLakeJune82008b.jpg http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/LakeFulmor600DPIdresized.jpg http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/BigBearLakeJune292008.jpg http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/SkyForestJune292008b.jpg I took this next picture about a week ago. We just had a winter storm and all the mountains were covered with snow. I took this with my Yashica A Twin Lens Reflex camera and Ilford SFX 200 film. I just wish I had a red filter for my camera: http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/December182008c.jpg Here are some other pictures, in color. These are with film, but I took them to get developed at a photo lab, since I don't know how to develop color film. The first 2 pictures are with the new Kodak Ektar 100 film. It's great for landscape photos. I didn't edit the pictures. The colors really are that saturated. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/December162008Ektar100film.jpg http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/December202008b.jpg This one is a little underexposed, but I guess it's not too bad: http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/oak_glen_ektar_100.jpg And one last picture! I was using selective focus here, to try to get a shallow depth of field and blur out the background a little to draw more attention to the flower. This was with Kodak Gold 200 film. I'm pretty sure I set the aperture to f/5.6 and the shutter speed to 1/300: http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/sunflower_selective_focus_aug_7_200.jpg I know there are a lot of links and a lot of pictures to look at! Thanks for taking the time to look at these! Thanks Amber! And yes, I did take all of these myself. That's another good thing with film...I can always prove that I took the pictures because I have the original negatives! :) hey, thanks a lot everyone for all the compliments. I do appreciate that. But I'm looking for more specific comments. If there is something you like or dislike about the pictures, please let me know what and why. Edwin, you're right that most of the B&W pictures could have benefited from a yellow lens filter, since most B&W films are more sensitive to blue and do tend to overexpose the sky. In fact, I did use a yellow filter on the picture of the tree and maybe you can tell that the sky is a little darker with more cloud detail in the picture. Also, in the picture at the lake (Lake Fulmor) with the rocks at the left side...the film developer was actually too weak. I was using Kodak D-76 and I should have known right away when I noticed that it was already turning yellow. I was just too lazy and cheap to mix up new developer. So that's one reason why it has such low contrast. That one was my fault. And yes, the color pictures could definitely benefit with a polarizer and maybe even a neutral density filter...but I took that with an ancient Argus C-4 and I don't have a filter that will fit that camera :( And Victoria, if I'm using completely manual exposure and I develop my own film, than I think I'm well beyond just "aiming the camera and pressing a button." But thanks :)

haha okay time for a long answer get ready! 1st one- I love the vintage/old time look it has, it looks like there's too much contrast or something but I think that's what makes me like it so much. I love all the detail in the trees and even the houses across the water. No complaints =] 2nd- I like the reflections and composition but I think it would have more visual interest if you used a contrast filter to bright out more value in the grey areas. My favorite part is the rock off to the left 3rd- I really like this one, that's such an interesting subject and the branches are focused quite sharply. The branches are a little unbalanced (a lot on the left, more empty space on the right), but that can be forgiven since that tree is just so cool looking. (By the way where do you take these pictures? it looks like such a pretty area) 4th- very pretty scene, you could boost the contrast just slightly so you get a full dark in your value scale. The shadows along the path are quite interesting, and I like the slight curve of the trees at the top. It'd be nice if you focused on one area more sharply to better lead the eye through the photo. I do like the overall composition though 5th- I love this! you have a real range in value and I love the contrast of textures. the horizon line is very interesting and I love that from afar the photo almost looks like stripes of values. Great shot! 6th- (I wish I knew how to develop color film, if you have any interest in color film though I recommend William Eggleston, one of the first color photographers) I really like the sky in this one, the trees look blurred or something (it may just be the scanner though). I think the composition could be more interesting, but I like the viewpoint. The bottom left has a little too much empty space. I'd like it better if you cropped it so the tall red tree was at the left edge. It would create a diagonal line down and right which would make the photo more interesting. 7th- This one I like, the light is very soft and pretty. The branches are interesting the way they reach across the photo. It could be a little sharper focused on the branches. I think you hit the color very well though, the sky especially, lovely shade of blue. 8th- I actually like this the way it is. The vine makes it look kind of creepy (a good creepy though). I love the simplicity of color. The tree on the right is beautiful with the green leaves and the backlight of yellow. I love the brightness of the foreground in contrast with the dark blue of the background. I think this and the 5th one may be my favorites so far. 9th- very pretty, I love how delicate the flowers are. You created a nice mood with the colors and soft light. You did a nice job with the depth of field. It makes me wish i was there right now. The mountains in the background add to the photo as well. I'd say this would also be included in my favorites =] overall I really like them and I'm glad to see people still using film, in my opinion it's better than digital, just hard to deal with sometimes and very time consuming. With black and white it's best to always look for a full range of value (from black to white) unless you're specifically under or overdeveloping. And good light can be your best friend (creates amazing shadows and depth to photos). You can check out some of my photos if you're interested (no film ones since my scanner is broken at the moment, but maybe someday) http://www.flickr.com/photos/30864683@N05/
Tay  |  Read more

---

 

Wolverine F2D300 7.3MP 35mm Slides and Negatives to Digital Image Converter (Blue)
$59.99

Canon CanoScan 9000F Color Image Scanner
Too low to display

Ion Audio USB Picture, Slide, and Film Scanner (PICS2PC)
Too low to display